Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 +15454%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GM200
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Board Design

28W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy