Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q +831%
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

34W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy