NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1792GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
+1288%
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
8
16
Shading Units
256
8
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
142W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
