NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Quadro GP100
+29442%
10.34 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1304 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
56
16
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
235W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GP100
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
