Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 34W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 +52%
0.035 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
1
16
Shading Units
8
8
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

34W
TDP
12W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy