NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 40W)
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1354MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.13GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Quadro P620
+3860%
1.386 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1354 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
4
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.66 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.33 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.66 GFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1386 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.33 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GP107
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
