NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+27020%
9.492 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
48
16
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
110W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
TU104B
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
