Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
4592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +42557%
14.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1230 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
72
16
Shading Units
4608
8
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

34W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy