NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
+24577%
8.637 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1215 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
20
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
34W
TDP
95W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G96
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
