Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075 +2837%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
14
16
Shading Units
448
8
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

34W
TDP
247W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
3 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy