Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +40271%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
80
16
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

34W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy