Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
A100 PCIe 80 GB +4118%
19.49 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jun 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1512 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
80GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1.94TB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
108
192
Shading Units
6912
64
TMUs
432
16
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
80 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA100
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy