NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+3534%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
108W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
DG2-512
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
