Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800 +6%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
5
192
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GF104
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy