Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800 +366%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

108W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G96
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy