Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40d

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40d

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40d to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40d 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Tesla K40d +992%
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
745 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2880
64
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
245W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK110B
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy