Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +3291%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
80
192
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GV100
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy