Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25 +2812%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
43.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
422.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Vega 10
N10E-GLM3-B2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy