NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA A10G
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
9120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
A10G
+13604%
31.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
72
96
Shading Units
9216
24
TMUs
288
24
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GA102
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
