Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 134W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M +87%
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
5
96
Shading Units
240
24
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

134W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GF104
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy