Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 134W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M +148%
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

134W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GK107
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.0
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy