NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
+3488%
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
20
96
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GA107S
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
Unknown
484 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
