NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 180W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000
+3757%
8.873 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1607 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
288.5GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
20
96
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
277.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
138.6 GFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.873 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
277.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
180W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GP104
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
GP104-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
