Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +6713%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
80
96
Shading Units
5120
24
TMUs
320
24
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

134W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GV100
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy