NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
+3372%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1110 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
40
96
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.97 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
249.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
110W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
TU104
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
N19E-Q3-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
