NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
3232 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
+3372%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
26
96
Shading Units
3328
24
TMUs
104
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GA106
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
90 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
12 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
