NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
13984 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+20713%
47.87 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
220
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
14080
24
TMUs
880
24
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
Aldebaran
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
