NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 226W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+670%
2.957 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2008
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
14
128
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
226W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
TU117B
G92-880-A2
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
