Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (23W vs 226W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4700 X2 +1728%
0.384 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2008
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
1
128
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

226W
TDP
23W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
G98
G92-880-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy