NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 2
+2064%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
56
192
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
