Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 12GB VRAM RTX A2000 12 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 12 GB +1628%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
26
192
Shading Units
3328
64
TMUs
104
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA106
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
12 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy