Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition +65%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
78W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy