NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2004
Release Date
Nov 2020
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
250 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
NV43
GPU Name
DG1
NV43 GL
GPU Variant
-
Curie
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
110 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
Unknown
154 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4
