Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 800W)
NVIDIA Tesla S1070 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
0.369 TFLOPS
Tesla S1070 +68%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
368.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
800W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy