Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +4056%
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
72
128
Shading Units
4608
32
TMUs
288
24
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
345.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

171W
TDP
260W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
TU102
G80-875-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy