Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
6016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +5440%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
160bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
48
128
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
192
24
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
345.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

171W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
AD104
G80-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy