Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
7648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +19094%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
7680
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
8 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy