Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +23219%
16.79 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

40W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
DG2-512
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy