Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +26525%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
48
32
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
AD104
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy