Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
Tesla M2075 +1327%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
448
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
72.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
GF110
G96-875-C1
GPU Variant
GF110-876-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
3 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy