Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (189W vs 450W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
14096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350 +7044%
44.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
512bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
14336
80
TMUs
896
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS

Board Design

189W
TDP
450W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
100 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy