Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (189W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c +466%
3.524 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
320bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
2496
80
TMUs
208
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Board Design

189W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy