Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
5648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 189W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Mobile +2739%
17.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
46
240
Shading Units
5888
80
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
276.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.66 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.66 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
276.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

189W
TDP
140W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy