Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 770M and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 770M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 +8798%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
36
32
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
8.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
160W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
TU104
NB9P-GLM2
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy