Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1935GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
6864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
A100 PCIe 80 GB +16701%
19.49 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Jun 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1512 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
80GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
1935GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
6912
16
TMUs
432
8
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GA100
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy