Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
6096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +9434%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy