Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +1439%
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GM206
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy