Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
3536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro GP100 +8041%
10.34 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1304 MHz
Base Clock
-
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
-
715 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
6
3584
Shading Units
48
224
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
323.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
20.67 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.34 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
5.168 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

235W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.0
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy