Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1785MHz vs 1442MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro GP100 +182%
10.34 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1304 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
715 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
16
3584
Shading Units
1024
224
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
323.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
20.67 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
10.34 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
5.168 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.0
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy