Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro GP100 +1110%
10.34 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1304 MHz
Base Clock
-
1442 MHz
Boost Clock
-
715 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
732.2GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
640
224
TMUs
40
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
24 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
323.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
20.67 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.34 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
5.168 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

235W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP100
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
15.3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
610 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.0
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy